Which action is a violation of the ARRT Rules of Ethics?

Discussing exam questions after a test is a violation of the ARRT Rules of Ethics because it undermines the integrity of the examination process and compromises the fairness of the assessment for all candidates. The ARRT emphasizes the importance of honesty and transparency in professional conduct, particularly in matters relating to examinations that determine competency. Engaging in discussions about exam questions can lead to an unfair advantage for some candidates over others, as it may influence future test-takers’ preparation and performance based on shared information.

Maintaining the confidentiality of exam content is crucial. The ARRT has strict guidelines to ensure that all candidates have an equal opportunity to succeed on their tests. Violating this confidentiality can result in serious consequences, including disciplinary action against the individual involved.

In contrast, the other choices pertain to issues that, while they can reflect poorly on a professional's practice, do not directly breach ethical standards in the same manner. For instance, excessive absenteeism and insufficient continuing education hours may indicate unprofessional behavior or a lack of commitment but do not involve the direct compromise of the ethical standards set by the ARRT like the sharing of exam questions does. Reporting unethical behavior is actually encouraged by the ARRT, demonstrating a commitment to upholding the integrity of the profession.